Main logo

Project
People
News
Discussion
Links


The Nordic 2002
Seminar

 Plenary papers


 Anthropology
 Sociology
 Public Health
 University of Helsinki
 
Expressions

Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies
P.O. Box 4, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki
E-Mail: marja-liisa.honkasalo@helsinki.fi, Telephone: +358-9-191 23915, +358-9-2989516
Main page  >  Discussion  
 Print this page

Discussion forum

   Add new discussion topic

The concept of suffering

2004/02/29    (MR.) RUN HITAND   (2 replies)


Just out of boredom...

...I felt like doing something, filling the emptiness...

...and so it crossed my mind to write about the topic, because I visited these pages yesterday, and got thinking about it afterwards.

I suppose it has to be in the english language, so...

***

If there are *expressions* of suffering, that means, that suffering is something distinct from it's expressions, in a way.

This is OK. Problematic, in my view, only at first glance.

I think, that this way of thinking, that you have chosen, implies that there is a sort of "binary" level of existence, common to all human beings.

At all times, a person is either suffering, or not, or is suffering a little (or much), or not suffering at all.

I suppose (this is my personal view, that is...) that these two levels could be named, just as well, for instance, *good* and *bad*, or, to take another example, "stress" and "no stress".

I really think, that is a very good way of thinking.

Nice foundation for a positive science of ethics this would make, for instance, I suppose, if it wouldn't be for the unfortunate (individualistic, not relational), understanding of human beings, that the positivists hold. And that the whole western world holds.

The sufferings that we express in our everyday lives, might then, under this scheme, very well hide behind them more complex meanings, and not be mere expressions of tissue-damage, a pathological or physiological state of affairs, or whatever. This would be a very real possibility.

And so a flu could be an expression of loneliness or dissapointment, and so on.

I think, you've got a good thing going on, here.


e-mail: digital_audio_tape2003@yahoo.com

Comment:
Please enter your name:
    


RE:The concept of suffering

2004/02/29    - RUN


I think I got a bit carried away w/ the idea of a positive science of ethics. Sorry about that.


Comment:
Please enter your name:
    


RE:The concept of suffering

2004/03/22    MÅIKKETILDEKKES


Any proper ethic notion will arrise from intuition, not calculations.


Comment:
Please enter your name:
    


 Topic

2004/02/29  (Mr.) Run Hitand

Just out of boredom...

...I felt like doing something, filling the emptiness...

...and so it crossed my mind to write about the topic, because I visited these pages yesterday, and got thinking about it afterwards.

I suppose it has to be in the english language, so...

***

If there are *expressions* of suffering, that means, that suffering is something distinct from it's expressions, in a way.

This is OK. Problematic, in my view, only at first glance.

I think, that this way of thinking, that you have chosen, implies that there is a sort of "binary" level of existence, common to all human beings.

At all times, a person is either suffering, or not, or is suffering a little (or much), or not suffering at all.

I suppose (this is my personal view, that is...) that these two levels could be named, just as well, for instance, *good* and *bad*, or, to take another example, "stress" and "no stress".

I really think, that is a very good way of thinking.

Nice foundation for a positive science of ethics this would make, for instance, I suppose, if it wouldn't be for the unfortunate (individualistic, not relational), understanding of human beings, that the positivists hold. And that the whole western world holds.

The sufferings that we express in our everyday lives, might then, under this scheme, very well hide behind them more complex meanings, and not be mere expressions of tissue-damage, a pathological or physiological state of affairs, or whatever. This would be a very real possibility.

And so a flu could be an expression of loneliness or dissapointment, and so on.

I think, you've got a good thing going on, here.


 Other comments

2004/02/29  - Run

I think I got a bit carried away w/ the idea of a positive science of ethics. Sorry about that.





2004/03/22  Måikketildekkes

Any proper ethic notion will arrise from intuition, not calculations.







News
2007/06/12 THESIS ON UNCERTAINTY

2005/01/28 NEW JOURNAL: "Health, sickness and culture"

2004/12/17 PhD Course in Medical Anthropology in Tarragona, Spain

2004/12/17 2nd ANNOUNCEMENT, The 4th Biennal Conference of the ...

2004/10/28 The Fourth Biennal Conference of the European Network ...



Discussion
2004/03/22 RE:The concept of suffering

2004/02/29 RE:The concept of suffering

2004/02/29 The concept of suffering


Copyright © 2002 Mika Lassander
mtl@kaapeli.fi
powered by ZOPE